There is a new book out “The History of the Peanut Allergy Epidemic” by Heather Fraser. The epidemic of fatal food allergies in our children is directly caused by vaccinations. Heather’s book is available on amazon.com and her website.

For more information on the connection between vaccinations and fatal food allergies see http://barbfeick.com/vaccinations

@kate- just because vaccines have eradicated some illnesses in the past does not mean that you should blindly accept a new vaccine that has been rushed to market. These are not people whining about their problems, this is people informing other people that there are great risks in taking these drugs. If you had a child that was suddenly paralyzed or began showing signs autism shortly after receiving a vaccine, I’m sure your tune would change.

I would go see a doctor or natual expert as quickly as possible. It should like you have got something serious.

anyway i also have had cold chills last 2 days and nights and there geting worse. its not cold in here or at my frends. and i even had heater on me still chills.
also headache. but i give them the doubt on that as it may be from the deep caulphing. the chills worry the heck out of me.

It also happens to be that our Ab Osterhaus, personal friend of our minister of health in the Netherlands, is the leader in the world Mex. flu-scam with his 5 job’s within the WHO and many other jobs in the farmaceutical industry.

He is now protected from the MSM, because of these alligations. I’m glad to tell you that we won’t protect this man in the Netherlands. The only one who will protect Ab Osterhaus is his personal friend, our minister of health Ab Klink and we are going to bring them down with all the prove we have.

I have researched the Mex. flu vaccine and I asure you: this is one very onsafe and dangerous vaccine.Tested in Viro-clinics in the Netherlands. Vero-clinic’s coincidently happens to be a big part of the income of Ab Osterhaus. And of course the findings were 100% safe !!
http://www.Farmacie.Come2me.nl

I had the swine flu and so did my kids. We all made it out fine. I know a few people personally who have had the shot and are now not well. No thanks big pharma.

sounds kinda like the american debate on healthcare, oh wait, what debate?

The company that makes XPC reported a “bizarre phenomenon” happening in their packing plant. Workers who came in contact with the product simply weren’t getting as sick as the office personnel—or workers nationwide. Looking deeper, they found that new employees with long histories of chronic ailments mysteriously improved after working in the dusty plant. And older employees hadn’t experienced a cold or the flu in 25 years.

A full-scale investigation found that XPC was increasing the employees’ NK (natural killer) immune activity by a whopping 500%. XPC also possesses 300% more antioxidant power than any known food. There’s really no difference between the human version and the animal supplement—except for the price.

he is still not altogether well, and not able to work.

We are not whining, spoiled Westerners. The sibling children who had a severe reaction are probably allergic, like I am. I have two friends who developed Guillain Barre Syndrome in 1990 after a flu shot. Both are still severely restricted in mobility. Since the H1N1 flu is no big deal, why take the risk of injecting the antigens and the adjuvants that make the immune system react so violently. My chiropractor and her son both had swine flu and were over it in three days.

Anyone who gets this vaccine is nuts.

Reading this article, and the comments posted in reply, makes me think of popular scare tactics, and knee-jerk reactions that are so prevalent in modern media. This is the same tactic people like Glenn Beck use to capture an audience. The article, and comments exclusively present a single point of view as gospel, while rudely accusing anyone presenting a contrasting viewpoint of being a “flack for the Industry.” This accusation is laughable for reasons I will get into later, but this tactic also serves to turn away any reasonable debate, since the accused is usually a normal person that wanted to inject some contrasting view points into what should be a reasonable debate. This sort of person will often rather leave you to build up your own worst case scenario, instead of trying to address your concerns, while putting up with constant harassment.

For full disclosure, I am a computer engineer, and I came here from a comment to a HuffPost article about the H1N1 Vaccine. The tone of the post I used to get here was not positive, instead it was trying to illustrate the strange things that certain groups will believe, and how little data is used to establish that belief. I say this not because I agree or disagree with it, but to illustrate the popular view regarding your site. The reason I can claim that a representative of the industry would not post here is simple; corporate politics. If you were a company making a vaccine, it would not benefit you in any way to acknowledge or address any group that the majority of the population would consider on the fringe. Unfortunately, this article would fall into that category on most mainstream websites. For a company to acknowledge a fringe group would be synonymous to them acknowledging that there is a problem. This is very bad for business. Further, even if they were to successfully alleviate all of your concerns, you are such a small group of people that they would not stand to gain anything from the effort. It is obvious that the vaccine is already in high demand, so a few extra people will not add much more to their profits. I would even to as far as to say that posting on here might be bad for your long term employment in a pharmaceutical company.

You say ignorance is bliss; well, I invite you to leave your comfort zone, and understand all of the contrary data. I do not ask you to acknowledge that it is correct, but instead to go through and understand what it means. A common statistic I hear thrown around is that 6 people out of 100,000 show adverse effects to the vaccine. Now, I will agree that 6 people is 6 too many, but you must ask yourself, without the vaccine, what percentage of people would be even more negatively affected? It only stands to reason, after all, that the vaccine would do what it was designed to do, namely improve your immune response to the H1N1 virus. There would not be any reason at all to release it otherwise. It is also a known statistic that a certain percentage of the population will get sick, and die from H1N1. Even with some people reporting that it is milder than a normal seasonal flu, it is still a dangerous infectious disease. So now, you are left with a difficult choice. Do you accept the natural flu deaths, or do you take the adverse effects.

Let me illustrate the problem with a simple example. Let us say that without vaccination 10 (made up number) of 100,000 people will die from the swine flu, however with the vaccine only 5 (also made up number) of 100,000 will die from the side effects. In this scenario banning the vaccine will cost you 5 more lives than accepting it. These statistics do not make the loss any easier, but they illustrate the difficult questions that must be faced by the people at the top. There are also calls for a greener vaccine, but therein lies another set of problems. Do we have the technology to make the green vaccine, especially in sizable quantities? If this technology does not exist, then clearly your choice is the current vaccination, or none at all. Also, can you make the green vaccine at a profit or at least break even? This is a tough question, and for a lot of people even asking it is wrong, but consider this. You must manufacture 100,000,000 doses of the vaccine. Now let us say that each dose of a green vaccine costs you $100, but the government has offered to pay you $90 each. If you go ahead, and make the green vaccine, your company will need to eat a $10 * 100,000,000 = $1 billion cost. No one is going to be able to do this, least of all a company that needs to answer to its shareholders.

By contrast, reality may be a different scenario. What if each vaccine actually cost $50 to make, but you charge the government $90. You would now be making an 80% profit. It is this sort of behavior that needs to be stamped out. The existence of a vaccine you don’t like, while not perfect, should not be the focus of your campaign. Instead, you should see its existence and popularity as a sign that you are not doing enough to ensure there is a safer replacement.

So again, these questions, and the answers you may receive are certainly not easy. There are so many factors to consider, such as global health, environmental impact, health impact, social impact, media and public relations, and countless other variables. To present the issue as a question of the good green side vs the bad vaccine is doing a disservice not only to the people that spent years working on this technology, but also to yourself and to society. If you were to put the effort you currently put into the green campaign to rationally approach the people in power, and calmly present your cases, as well as any possible solutions, you will find that a lot more gets accomplished.

So, in conclusion. You would be much better served addressing your concerns in a rational, well formed debate. One of the key requirements to succeed is to come of not as confrontational, but as reasonable, and concerned. I see a lot of people with interesting things to say; cases that may truly be related to problems with the vaccine, and real concern regarding toxicity and effect. However, I also see a lot of pointless bashing: hate for doctors that prescribe the vaccine, even if they are simply doing what they feel is best based on their education; hate for posters that dare to post a contradicting viewpoint; hate for the companies that make the vaccine, accusing them of wanting to kill everyone. Please, please understand that absolutely nothing is gained from maintaining this image of a fringe group. If you want your point addressed, you need to go mainstream, to the parts of the internet where reasoned, logical, and scientific debate is the norm. Convince those people, and your point will suddenly be taken a lot more seriously.

And the people who are TRULY the stupid ones are the people who believe what our government TELLS them to believe. For once, open your eyes and use your brain. Things are not as they appear. Think OUTSIDE your government box and find out the truth! The whole purpose of the vaccinations is to kill off the “useless eaters” – that means YOU!

Your post is very misleading. So you are saying EVERYONE that has a reaction and or dies is lying about the fact that they JUST GOT the H1N1 shot prior??? Are you saying every single person got the H1N1 shot in your town?? How is that possible?? Did everyone report back 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month later to say how well they are doing?? EVERYONE???

The H1N1 vaccine has not been tested and we have no idea what the long term effects are going to be. But we are already seeing terrible reactions and deaths, just like in 1976, where we had more damage done from the vaccine than from the virus itself.

Plant your seeds somewhere else BB~

However, everyone now has to take their own responsibility for themselves! SO -

take this responsibility seriously and REFUSE THE SHOT!